Kevin Karhan :verified:<p>I think that <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/CAMM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CAMM</span></a> is a bad design compared to <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SODIMM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SODIMM</span></a> & <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/DIMM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DIMM</span></a>... </p><ul><li>Like <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a>'s bs of <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SolderedDownRAM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SolderedDownRAM</span></a> but <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXp4g-KzdAI" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">just slightly less worse</a> cuz now one could <em>only in theory</em> get a daughterboard and doesn't have to replace individual chips.</li></ul><p>Still, just gimme regular-ass socketed Chips & <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/DIMMs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DIMMs</span></a> ffs!</p><ul><li>Also we don't need to make the THINN-nest machines ffs - just make them <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/repairable" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>repairable</span></a> and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/serviceable" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>serviceable</span></a> and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/upgradeable" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>upgradeable</span></a>, because <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AntiRepairDesign" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AntiRepairDesign</span></a> is way more unsustainable than the 0,1% of idiots who give a shit about whether their <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/DDR5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DDR5</span></a>-RAM can do 6400MT/s or 4800MT/s, simply because most users won't notice that at all (unlike switching from a 2,5" <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SATA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SATA</span></a>-<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/HDD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HDD</span></a> running at 5400rpm to an <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/NVMe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NVMe</span></a>-<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SSD</span></a> that maxes out <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PCIe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PCIe</span></a> 4x connections.</li></ul><p><a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FACT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FACT</span></a>: <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RAM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RAM</span></a> & <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SSD</span></a>|s are inevitably dying due to age and use and like <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ThermalPaste" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ThermalPaste</span></a> need to be <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/replaceable" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>replaceable</span></a> for a device to work longterm!</p><ul><li>So stop the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Enshittification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Enshittification</span></a> of <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a> FFS!</li></ul><p>I'd rather have a <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/THICC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>THICC</span></a> af <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/laptop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>laptop</span></a> that actually survives my daily use than some flimsy <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/tablet" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tablet</span></a> that snaps in half if I sneeze at it.</p><ul><li>No seriously, most devices can't even fit proper ports and cooling fans for no good reason whatsoever!</li></ul><p>Also I think it's insulting to frame basic <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXp4g-KzdAI&t=306s" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">things like</a> <em>"stability"</em> as a negative.</p><ul><li>Guess what? People want to <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/GetShitDone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GetShitDone</span></a> and the folks that actually buy a <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/MobileWorkstation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MobileWorkstation</span></a> want to be able to rely on that equipment...</li></ul>