Ok, I’ve been trying to follow the Friendica code and I may be reading it wrongly, but it looks to me like the BBcode gets converted to HTML for most platforms, but then that HTML gets converted to Markdown for Diaspora (and I think Hubzilla?). But if that’s the case I don’t understand how the BBcode is getting all the way through to those other platforms as shown in the screenshots @Matthias posted?

It looks to me like it should be sending the <span> to them as well not the raw BBcode, because it seems the HTML to Markdown converter by default "preserves HTML tags without Markdown equivalents like <span> and <div>." At least according to the README in /friendica/vendor/league/html-to-markdown/ - which also says [i]"To strip HTML tags that don’t have a Markdown equivalent while preserving the content inside them, set strip_tags…"

So in:

/friendica/src/Content/Text/HTML.php
If I change line 684 from :

$converter = new HtmlConverter([‘hard_break’ => true]);

$converter = newHtmlConverter([‘hard_break’ => true, ‘strip_tags’ => true]);

Or am I completely barking up the wrong tree here?

@Hypolite Petovan

@Pygoscelis Papua

I have a few general optimization suggestions:
- Convert CSS to SASS (.scss)
- Compile .css and min.css (minified) files
- Use min.css files by default, with an option in the theme settings to switch to the non-minified CSS file

This would significantly reduce the CSS file size and simplify writing CSS.

I'm not convinced adding a CSS pre-processor will really help. A bunch of the stylesheets are already modularized and PHP processes variables and concatenates those files on the server side already. That might be why none of the stylesheets I've looked at in Friendica are minified, like maybe it messes up parsing them or something? I'll have to test it on my dev server.

I'm not a fan of CSS pre-processors though. After nearly 30 years of doing web design+dev I don't like to introduce dependencies if I don't need to because I've seen a lot of these things come and go. Next week someone will tell me to rewrite it in PostCSS. 🤷 The only reason I can think to use them now is to support advanced CSS features for old browsers nobody should probably be using anymore. Because modularization, nesting rules, pseudo-selectors, variables, computation, reassigning values at runtime, and color transforms are now all built into vanilla CSS for modern browsers. Bookface is already making use of most of those features, and the PHP pre-processing is taking care of the rest.

So minifying and/or compressing is probably the best bet for optimizing it, but the real solution is probably a major rewrite or replacement of the underlying "Frio" theme itself, which is very, very code-heavy (thanks to legacy code reflecting its age). But that...will be a major undertaking because that theme has a lot of "moving parts."

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es anders interpretiert, aber bin da auch wahrlich kein Experte:

Namensnennung — Sie müssen angemessene Urheber- und Rechteangaben machen , einen Link zur Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Diese Angaben dürfen in jeder angemessenen Art und Weise gemacht werden, allerdings nicht so, dass der Eindruck entsteht, der Lizenzgeber unterstütze gerade Sie oder Ihre Nutzung besonders.

-> Angeben das die Bedingungen
auf dem Leitfaden basieren:
"Sofern nicht anders angegeben, basieren alle Angaben auf dem Leitfaden für den Instanz-Betrieb im dezentralen Netzwerk der Stiftung Datenschutz unter der CC BY-ND 4.0-Lizenz veröffentlicht. Die Lizenzbedingungen sind auf der Website von Creative Commons einsehbar."

Keine Bearbeitungen — Wenn Sie das Material remixen, verändern oder darauf anderweitig direkt aufbauen , dürfen Sie die bearbeitete Fassung des Materials nicht verbreiten.

Das Anpassen der Erklärung in der zum Beispiel die Adresse der Instanz konkret gegenüber der Vorlage angepasst wird habe ich als "nutzen" interpretiert und nicht als "verbreiten"

Wenn das so tatsächlich nicht erlaubt ist, wäre der Zweck der Muster ja hinfällig?

OMG. Your DB is huge! How many active users do you have? I have 183 active monthly users. My DB, the size of which was concerning to me, is tiny compared to yours.

I had a big jump between March 12th and 13th, but not much change after that.

Do you use relays?

+-----------------------------+-----------+
| Table | Size (MB) |
+-----------------------------+-----------+
| post-user | 29878.48 |
| post-content | 19003.97 |
| item-uri | 12799.42 |
| contact | 7692.91 |
| post-media | 6125.52 |
| apcontact | 5773.69 |
| post-searchindex | 5591.05 |
| post | 5423.69 |
| post-thread-user | 5178.36 |
| contact-relation | 2944.30 |
| photo | 2893.56 |
| post-tag | 2528.31 |
| parsed_url | 992.78 |

worker [ERROR]: DB Error {"code":1205,"error":"Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction","params":"DELETE FROM `post-user`  WHERE (`uid` = XXXX)","worker_id":"dc8312b","worker_cmd":"ExpireAndRemoveUsers"}...